Skip to main content

Universal Vs. Targeted Affirmative Action In Kenya

Affirmative action is about giving an otherwise disadvantaged or marginalized group privileges or preferential treatment.In order to empower women and enable them to compete favorably with men in the Kenyan society, affirmative action has been embraced. Affirmative action is hailed because it offers a disadvantaged group the opportunity to develop their skills, talent and acumen such that they can compete at the same level as their more privileged compatriots. The first gender based affirmative action in Kenya was in the education sector where girls are given lower entry level cut off points compared to boys. Through such an action, more girls have been able to join secondary schools and institutions of higher learning .

Another area where affirmative action was deemed necessary is in politics. Women participation in politics in Kenya has been peripheral. Since independence, women have been underrepresented both in elective and non elective public offices. The first election in Kenya was held in 1963 and there was no woman legislature. Due to agitation, by 1997 women were 4.1% of the parliamentarians. This number increased to 8.1% in 2002 and in 2007 due to more women being elected and nominated, the number increased to 9.8%.

One of the most commonly used affirmative action measures is use of quotas. A quota is a fixed percentage that is prescribed to the disadvantaged group. In Kenya, one such quota is the two thirds gender rule. The two thirds gender rule applies to all positions in public service. To ensure gender parity, the new constitution of 2010 introduced the two thirds gender rule that applies to elective as well as public service positions. At the national level, there has been heated debate on how to implement the two third gender rule considering that in the first post new constitution election only 5.5% of elected members of parliament were women.

Gender related universal affirmative action has served the gender divide well through enhancing access for women. However, it is about time the question of whether all women deserve affirmative action is asked especially in the area of employment and in politics. There are women who have had equal and some even better opportunities than men. While Universal affirmative action reduces risk of leaving out deserving ones, it also is increasingly providing undue advantages to many privileged women in the Kenyan society. Consequently, the boy child in Kenya is left behind and men are increasingly becoming the marginalized lot. By the foregoing considerations, I would make a case for targeted affirmative action. This would mean, privileges are based on a system that facilitates thorough screening so that both deserving men and women benefit from affirmative action.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

YOUTH EMPOWERMENT STRATEGY

If there is anything Kenya and Africa may pride in, it is the youthful population. However, is the youthful population a blessing or a curse? It is a curse to the extent unemployment remains high in our nation? It is a blessing to the extent our governments (national and county) are focused on job creation and engaging the youth in meaningful work towards nation building. In the recent past, the government has rolled out a number of initiatives towards youth empowerment         i.             Making education scholarships more accessible       ii.             The youth funds     iii.             Sports tournaments and competitions     iv.             Youth polytechnic...
6 comments
Read more

10 REASONS WHY UHURU KENYATTA MAYBE A ONE TERM PRESIDENT

1.       In 2017 Uhuru will be carrying the burden of incumbency and all unfulfilled dreams will be credited to him by Kenyans 2.       If he succeeds to halt The Hague cases or gets them differed, the ICC issue will be a major campaign platform in 2017. However, unlike in 2013 when it worked to his advantage, Kenyans know that ICC trials are no longer a personal matter. Actually, the president is using the country as hostage against ICC onslaught 3.       There is a high possibility of Ruto beginning to feel jitters about his position in Jubilee and the likelihood of being a credible presidential candidate one day. The more time goes by, the more Ruto’s supporters will want more; some excitement, some surprise 4.       There is a likelihood of Uhuru manages to frustrate his case while that of Ruto drags on. The case of Walter Barasa being used by the Deputy President o...
6 comments
Read more

AFTER SABA SABA, WHAT NEXT FOR RAILA?

Saba Saba is here with us and I doubt our leaders are interested in blinking; each of them is likely to put on the straight face and hold ground, of course as the ego dictates. Uhuru Kenyatta is doing well so far; by remaining silent and appearing to ignore he hopes to wear Raila out. Such an approach is described in social psychology as tanking. It simply means you put pressure on your opponent through inactivity or passive response. Uhuru Kenyatta enjoys the privilege of state control and thus state bureaucracy gives him room for impunity. Raila has no option than to raise stakes and force those that enjoy state power to yield to his influence. From a purely power game point of view, Raila has done well so far; he has characteristically managed to raise the stakes. Uhuru may choose to ignore, but the stakes are too high, just a simple miss step and Kenya could be on the precipice again. All it takes is a simple rumor that what has been doing rounds on social media is actually ...
4 comments
Read more