Rethinking Multi-Party Democracy and Political Stability in Africa
There is no bigger problem that Africa
has faced rather than conflicts. To curb or stop the blood-letting across
Africa, democracy has often been suggested as the remedy. Democratization in
itself is very appealing; a government of the people, for the people is a
desirable ideal. It means that each citizen is self-governing in the sense that
his/her voice is put into consideration in the making of national policies.
Like any other ideal, concretising a democracy seems to be more complicated
than African leaders have been ready to acknowledge.
In most African countries, political
contests are about ethnic supremacy and political alliances are formed along
ethnic lines. In most cases, the elites make the pacts and whip their groups
into endorsing their decisions. Tribal chiefs are thus most instrumental in
determining political processes in most African countries. The political pacts
or alliances of tribes are often driven by the desire to control national resources
at the expense of other tribes. With ethnicity playing a major role in national
planning and policy-making, inclusion driven meritocracy is critical for
stability in such nations
The debate on predictable succession in
Africa is closely linked to adoption of multi-party democracy. Multi-party
democracy has taken different forms across the world. The exercise of
democratic elections has always been context specific since inception of
democratic ideals. Despite many African countries adopting multi-party
democracy, popular democracy is yet to take root especially in African
countries
Political parties and their
functionality define how countries meet the democratic principles of equity,
accountability, transparency, inclusion and participation. Internal balance of
power within nations is dependent on existence or lack of political parties and
the nature of political parties’ actions on national issues. To attain predictable
political succession in Africa, it is important to have strong institutional
arrangements, which clearly empower political parties as the most significant
political players in a political system. Good political parties are responsive
to the prevalent political climate within a state. Considering the ethnic
fracture lines that define the stability of many sovereign states in Africa, a
political party governing framework has to put into consideration ethnic
representation.
It is informative to note that,
stability in most African countries was realized at a time when political
competition was limited to one major political movement or party.
The Case of Kanu in Kenya
Kenya enjoyed relative peace and
stability for a long time despite the chaos in the larger great lakes region.
This can be attributed to the stability of KANU as a unifying political entity.
After the run up to independence ideological differences between leaders in
Kanu and Kaddu were dealt with; Kanu became the only stable vehicle through
which all political leaders channeled their ambitions. While the excesses of
KANU leaders are detestable, there is truth to perspective that have a one
party state helped stem ethnic mobilization and balkanization in Kenya.
The Case of CCM in Tanzania
Chama Cha Mapinduzi in Tanzania coupled
with Julius Nyerere’s attempt to define a philosophy, Ujamaa thinking, that
predisposed Tanzanians to Undugu and Ubuntu has made Tanzania an Island of
peace and stability.
The Case of NRM in Uganda
Uganda was volatile since independence with
ethnic communities from central Uganda fighting ethnic communities from the
North. When the national resistance Army (NRA) led by Museveni defeated the
northerner dominated army, Ugandans as well as the rest of the world sighed
with relief. The National Resistance Army rebranded to National Resistance
Movement (NRM). NRM was anchored on communist ideologies owing to the Ujamaa
influence from Tanzania. The NRM has mutated from a communist leaning
totalitarian party to a political party like many others in Uganda. Despite the
changes over time, it remains the most dominant political institution in
Uganda. Much of the peace and oneness enjoyed in Uganda can be attributed to
the genius of the NRM. NRM for long has been a single vehicle through which
leaders irrespective of ethnicity competed for a leadership role.
The Case of
Burundi
In Burundi, at independence, the
president was a Tutsi, which is a minority group compared to the 85% of the
population that are Hutu. Consequently, there were numerous coup attempts with
the Hutu seeking to topple the Tutsi led government. In 1998, following talks
brokered by retired president of Tanzania Julius Nyerere assisted by then
Tanzanian President, Benjamin Mkapa and Nelson Mandela; an inclusive government
was formed comprising both Tutsi and Hutu cabinet ministers. Despite a peace
deal being signed in 1998, the Hutu rebels continued with their sabotage
activities against president Buyoya. This led to protracted negotiations and in
2001 another peace deal was brokered by regional heads of government suggesting
rotational or alternating presidency; as a solution to the Tutsi versus Hutu
duel. In 2001, a number of coup attempts were made against the government of
Buyoya. The negotiations of 2001 led to an agreement that would see Buyoya head
a transitional government with a Hutu vice president and later hand over to
Pierre Nkurunziza a Hutu with a Tutsi vice president. The signing of the Arusha
agreement in effect led to an end to a military regime led by Buyoya. The
headache in Burundi has been how the two tribes can accommodate each other in
government while allowing for popular democracy yet the Hutu are a majority.
Through an institutional arrangement where the all are accommodated in
government, ethnic animosity is controlled.
The Case of MPLA in Angola
At independence, MPLA formed the
government but was quickly opposed by two rebel movements; the National Front
for the Liberation of Angola (NFLA) and National Union for the total Liberation
of Angola (UNITA). Just like in many other African countries, the problem in
Angola is ethnic based. In order to manage the country, the Portuguese created
regional divisions based on ethnicity. When national liberation movements were
being formed, they were formed along ethnocentric lines. Backed by ethnic
communities in rural areas, UNITA waged a long war against MPLA government.
However, through centralizing of political competition in MPLA and inclusivity
arrangements, there is currently, relative calm in Angola.
One Party Based competition and
Stability in Africa
While the communist party in china can
be criticized on many fronts, I personally believe it offers a model of
inclusivity that tribal chiefs and war lords in Africa should adopt for greater
political stability. In Africa, it is important to move away from winner takes
all kind of electioneering. While Western model of multi-party politics is
good, it cannot adequately work in Africa due to ethnic balkanization.
In Africa, when a political party
looses, it is not just the party but an ethnic group that has lost. Therefore,
there is need for political arrangements that allow winners to enjoy certain privileges
while the losers still are seen to enjoy given privileges through their
leaders. Taking the case of Kenya, there is need to strengthen parliament. I
would be considerable if the opposition leaders became the leaders of minority
in parliament rather than being left in the cold for five years. What African needs
to work on is having fewer political parties and a formula for sharing privileges
among the political parties after election. For instance, there is no harm in
considering the Rwandan model where all parties contribute a certain share of
cabinet secretaries or ministers after elections. The number of cabinet
secretaries or ministers a party nominates should be pegged on number of national
assembly seats garnered. There is no harm in extending the same formula to all
government appointments. Such that based on ratio of votes garnered, all
political parties in an election have a chance of having a share of government through
appointments.
African countries do not need multi-parties;
African countries need Inclusive Government Structures that accommodate all
ethnic groups. This should be the area of focus for those interested in
political stability and seamless transition in African countries.
Comments
Post a Comment