Skip to main content

The Art of Argumentation in the Age of Social Media

In today’s digital world, argumentation is everywhere. From Twitter threads to WhatsApp groups, Facebook comments to Telegram channels, people are constantly debating, sometimes about serious issues, but often about nothing in particular.

And that’s not necessarily a bad thing.

Healthy argumentation is a sign of an engaged society. But the problem with social media is that it often amplifies opinion over logic, emotion over evidence, and ego over enlightenment.

So how do we bring back the lost art of meaningful argumentation?

🤔 Why Do You Argue?

Before you jump into your next online debate, ask yourself:

  • Am I trying to satisfy my ego?
  • Do I want to share my views?
  • Am I offering a different perspective?
  • Do I want to show what I’ve learned?
  • Is this just for fun or to pass time?
  • Am I trying to impress others?
  • Or am I arguing just because I can?

Your motivation matters. It shapes the tone, depth, and outcome of your argument.

🧩 The Logic Behind Good Arguments

To argue well, you need more than just opinions—you need logic. Here are some key concepts:

1. Forms of Logic

  • Deductive Logic: Starts with general truths and leads to a specific conclusion.
    Example:
    All humans are mortal.
    Socrates is human.
    Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
  • Inductive Logic: Uses specific observations to form general conclusions.
    Example:
    The sun has risen every day.
    So, it will rise tomorrow.
  • Abductive Logic: Infers the most likely explanation.
    Example:
    The grass is wet.
    It probably rained last night.

2. Valid Syllogisms

A syllogism is a logical structure with two premises and a conclusion. If the structure is valid and the premises are true, the conclusion must be true.

3. Common Logical Fallacies

Watch out for these traps:

  • Ad hominem: Attacking the person, not the argument.
  • Straw man: Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack.
  • Appeal to authority: Using someone’s status as proof without evidence.
  • False dilemma: Presenting only two options when more exist.
  • Slippery slope: Arguing that one step will lead to extreme consequences.

🧘‍♂️ The Power of Humility

Socrates once said, “The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.”

This kind of humility is essential in argumentation. It keeps you open to learning, willing to listen, and ready to revise your views. Arrogance, on the other hand, leads to stubbornness and shallow thinking.

🛠️ Practical Tips for Constructive Argumentation

If you must argue, do it wisely:

  1. Choose your opponent carefully
    Don’t waste energy arguing with trolls, bigots, or those unwilling to reason.
  2. Be clear on your purpose
    Know why you’re engaging. Mixing issues muddies the waters.
  3. Prefer moderated spaces
    Structured debates often lead to more productive discussions.
  4. Know when to stop
    Not every argument is worth your time. Walk away when it becomes toxic or circular.

🎯 Final Thoughts: Argue to Understand, Not to Win

Argumentation isn’t about crushing your opponent—it’s about seeking truth, sharing insight, and growing together.

So next time you find yourself in a debate, ask: Am I adding value? Or just adding noise?

Enjoy constructive argumentation!

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear African Sun

Dear African sun Dear godly son of the unseen Dear holy daughter of heavens Dear grand father of life and seas Hear me oh ancient warmth Hear me divine providence sheath Listen sustainer of all growth Understand me kiss of strength Where are you my love? How my body misses the caress of your rays How are you godly slave? How your distance slays our senses Come back African sun Draw close sweet friend, don't be gloomy I implore you African warmth, without pun Smile again and put the cold to shame

10 REASONS WHY UHURU KENYATTA MAYBE A ONE TERM PRESIDENT

1.       In 2017 Uhuru will be carrying the burden of incumbency and all unfulfilled dreams will be credited to him by Kenyans 2.       If he succeeds to halt The Hague cases or gets them differed, the ICC issue will be a major campaign platform in 2017. However, unlike in 2013 when it worked to his advantage, Kenyans know that ICC trials are no longer a personal matter. Actually, the president is using the country as hostage against ICC onslaught 3.       There is a high possibility of Ruto beginning to feel jitters about his position in Jubilee and the likelihood of being a credible presidential candidate one day. The more time goes by, the more Ruto’s supporters will want more; some excitement, some surprise 4.       There is a likelihood of Uhuru manages to frustrate his case while that of Ruto drags on. The case of Walter Barasa being used by the Deputy President o...

Correcting Mutahi Ngunyi's Self Serving Tyranny of Numbers

I used to love reading Mutahi Ngunyi’s column, as a social science student, because of his skewed and hypothetical way of looking at reality. I always found his line of reasoning fascinating and attractive but always problematic and leaving a lot to be desired. Now I know why his writings used to make sense while at the same time seeming biased. Mutahi Ngunyi thrives not because he is the best at political analysis but because he is the best at stoking political controversy. In my own thinking, Mutahi Ngunyi has mastered the art of exaggerating the truth and using witty stories to spark controversy and attract attention. Recently he was at it again, acting brilliant with the aim of diabolically hyping ethnic calculations and machinations on the 2013 election considerations. Before we are accused of attacking Mutahi Ngunyi’s person without merit, let us consider his postulations. Mutahi Ngunyi argues that the 2013 elections are a foregone conclusion; Uhuru is the president wait...