State and the Markets: Why legislating Interest Rates Makes Development Sense
Kenya became independent in the 1960s; in the post-world war II
era and the glory of Marshall Plan for Europe was mesmerizing thinkers. The
modernization thinkers were advancing the thinking that transformation of
traditional structures to modern structures; mechanistic alliances to organic
alliances were the developmental path. Different thinkers strived to show how
rational “the modern” was against the archaic traditional structures. Thus
modernization thinkers like Rostow prescribed stages of growth and development.
In the 1960s still, frustration was beginning to be felt at the
seeming impossibility of all countries to transform as prescribed by the Eurocentric
models. The foreign aid justifying theories such as focus on colonialism and
its impact were questioned. Consequently, thinkers started considering
determinants of structural change. Focus on balance of trade made import
substitution a most celebrated economic model. Thus countries were urged to
focus on comparative advantage and protectionism for the sake of infant local
industries.
The world oil crisis and the attendant world debt crisis led to
shift in focus from structure of the economy to role of the state in the economy.
Thinkers went back to classical economic theory that emphasized the free hand
of the market. Neo-classical liberal theory sees the role of the state as unnecessary
interference that creates inefficiency and distortions. On the other hand,
markets are viewed as perfect and market forces are deemed to always create an
equilibrium that serves rationally in the best interest of all people. This
kind of thinking informed the structural adjustment programs that were advanced
by the Bretton woods system. At the heart of structural adjustment programmes
was believe that privatization and liberalizing of markets unbridles market
potential and leads to professionalism that allows for growth.
Fast forward and we all know the SAPS did more harm than good.
People started to question neo-classical economic development perspectives. The
question of State action on one hand and free hand of the market remains an unresolved issue for may thinkers
who think the only solution is “either or”. Consider the current debate in Kenya
on whether the president should assent to the banking amendment bill 2015,
which seeks to introduce interest rate caps.
Straight jacket thinking economists, articulate in neoliberal
economic school of thought, are up in arms against capping interest rates. They
can't imagine that markets can be rogue. They believe that things only work
best when the state does not interfere in the markets.
An institutional theoretical lens shows that different
institutions affect society based on how they interact. The Neo-Marxist
perspective helps to show the exploitative linkages in the economic system
despite market conditions being perfect considering that capitalists will
always work to perpetuate their selfish interest.
From a postmodernist perspective, the different economic
perspectives or jackets are mere narratives that should always be informed by
context dynamics. When the different perspectives are considered, it is safe to
argue that State and Markets ought to complement each other. The markets should
be free but there is need for strong State acting to address market imperfections
and distortions. The markets require a referee; the hand of the market requires
a referee so that individuals with monopolistic power do not misuse their
power.
There are many examples why strong state intervention is key for
sustained economic growth. China and Asian tigers have shown that it is
actually never about "the free hand of the market" but informed
government choices. The days of professionalism being the preserve of private
sector are yet to be realized in Kenya. The perception that the private sector
acts rationally is proven to be merely a myth. Just as we have corruption in
government, the private sector in Kenya, Banking sector included, are guilty of
foul play. The developmental state, focused on a holistic social transformation
agenda, should have its influence both direct and indirect on every sector of
the economy.
Comments
Post a Comment