Universal Vs. Targeted Affirmative Action In Kenya
Affirmative action is about giving an otherwise disadvantaged or marginalized group privileges or preferential treatment.In order to empower women and enable
them to compete favorably with men in the Kenyan society, affirmative action
has been embraced. Affirmative action is hailed because it
offers a disadvantaged group the opportunity to develop their skills, talent
and acumen such that they can compete at the same level as their more
privileged compatriots. The first gender based affirmative action in Kenya was
in the education sector where girls are given lower entry level cut off points
compared to boys. Through such an action, more girls have been able to join
secondary schools and institutions of higher learning .
Another area where affirmative action
was deemed necessary is in politics. Women participation in politics in Kenya
has been peripheral. Since independence, women have been underrepresented both
in elective and non elective public offices. The first election in
Kenya was held in 1963 and there was no woman legislature. Due to agitation, by
1997 women were 4.1% of the parliamentarians. This number
increased to 8.1% in 2002 and in 2007 due to more women being elected and
nominated, the number increased to 9.8%.
One of the most commonly used
affirmative action measures is use of quotas. A quota is a fixed percentage
that is prescribed to the disadvantaged group. In Kenya, one such quota is the
two thirds gender rule. The two thirds gender rule applies to all positions in
public service. To ensure gender parity, the new constitution of 2010
introduced the two thirds gender rule that applies to elective as well as
public service positions. At the national level, there has been heated debate
on how to implement the two third gender rule considering that in the first
post new constitution election only 5.5% of elected members of parliament were
women.
Gender related universal affirmative action has served the gender divide well through enhancing access for women. However, it is about time the question of whether all women deserve affirmative action is asked especially in the area of employment and in politics. There are women who have had equal and some even better opportunities than men. While Universal affirmative action reduces risk of leaving out deserving ones, it also is increasingly providing undue advantages to many privileged women in the Kenyan society. Consequently, the boy child in Kenya is left behind and men are increasingly becoming the marginalized lot. By the foregoing considerations, I would make a case for targeted affirmative action. This would mean, privileges are based on a system that facilitates thorough screening so that both deserving men and women benefit from affirmative action.
Comments
Post a Comment